Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11773119›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2002

Serotype identification of group B streptococci by PCR and sequencing.

Fanrong Kong, Sonia Gowan, Diana Martin, Gregory James, Gwendolyn L Gilbert

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Towards a holistic epidemiology ofFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of invasive group B Streptococcus infections in adults in a referral center in Korea.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecular Characterization ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Group B Streptococcus vaccine: state of the art.Therapeutic advances in vaccines · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fanrong KongCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Sonia Gowan
Diana Martin
Gregory James
Gwendolyn L Gilbert
Westmead Institute for Medical Research · AUNew Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group B streptococcus (GBS; Streptococcus agalactiae) is the most common cause of neonatal and obstetric sepsis and is an increasingly important cause of septicemia in elderly individuals and immunocompromised patients. Ongoing surveillance to monitor GBS serotype distribution will be needed to guide the development and use of GBS conjugate vaccines. We designed sequencing primers based on the previously published sequences of the capsular polysaccharide (cps) gene clusters to further define partial cps gene clusters for eight of the nine GBS serotypes (serotypes Ia to VII). Subsequently, we designed and evaluated primers to identify serotypes Ia, Ib, III, IV, V, and VI directly by PCR and all eight serotypes (serotypes Ia to VII) by sequence heterogeneity. A total of 206 clinical GBS isolates were used to compare our molecular serotype (MS) identification method with conventional serotyping (CS). All clinical isolates were assigned an MS, whereas 188 of 206 (91.3%) were assigned a serotype by use of antisera. A small number of isolates (serosubtypes III-3 and III-4) showed different serotype specificities between PCR and sequencing, but the PCR results correlated with those obtained by CS. The overall agreement between the MS identification method and CS for isolates for which results of both tests were available was 100% (188 of 188 isolates). The MS identification method is a specific and practical alternative to conventional GBS serotyping and will facilitate epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, DNABacterial CapsulesBase SequenceGenetic VariationHumansMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionSerotypingStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiae

Identifiers

PMID11773119
PMCPMC120111
OpenAlexW2127839576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.