ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2001
Effect of three nonpeptide cholecystokinin antagonists on human isolated gallbladder.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasonographic assessment of gastric and gallbladder dynamics in human health and disease.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Review
- An update on the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstone disease.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Involvement of endogenous CCK and CCK1 receptors in colonic motor function.British journal of pharmacology · 2004Review
- Smooth muscle function and dysfunction in gallbladder disease.Current gastroenterology reports · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholecystokinin is the most important stimulant of postprandial gallbladder contraction, and a regulator of gallbladder fasting tone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dexloxiglumide on isolated human gallbladder contraction induced by cholecystokinin-octapeptide and to compare this effect to that of lorglumide and amiglumide, two glutaramic acid analogs of dexloxiglumide. The negative logarithms of the antagonist dissociation constant (pK(B)) values were 7.00 +/- 0.14, 6.95 +/- 0.11, and 6.71 +/- 0.10 for lorglumide, dexloxiglumide, and amiglumide, respectively. Dexloxiglumide produced a concentration-dependent rightward shift of the cholecystokinin-octapeptide curve, without affecting its maximal response. A similar effect was obtained both with lorglumide and amiglumide. Moreover, the slopes for the three antagonists did not differ significantly from unity. These data show that the three molecules have a potent antagonistic effect, of a competitive nature, on gallbladder cholecystokinin type 1 receptors. It may be concluded that dexloxiglumide, lorglumide, and amiglumide exhibit a promising therapeutic profile for biliary colic and other gastrointestinal disorders in which CCK1 receptors play important physiological roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.