Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11760229›Full record

ReviewMedicine, health care, and philosophy2001

Genetics and culture: the geneticization thesis.

H A ten Have

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Geneticization of Education and Its Bioethical Implications.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Geneticization and bioethics: advancing debate and research.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2007
    Article
  10. Genetic information in the age of genohype.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2006
    Article
  11. The geneticization of diagnostics.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2006
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

H A ten HaveDepartment of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. h.tenhave@efg.kun.nl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of 'geneticization' has been introduced in the scholarly literature to describe the various interlocking and imperceptible mechanisms of interaction between medicine, genetics, society and culture. It is argued that Western culture currently is deeply involved in a process of geneticization. This process implies a redefinition of individuals in terms of DNA codes, a new language to describe and interpret human life and behavior in a genomic vocabulary of codes, blueprints, traits, dispositions, genetic mapping, and a gentechnological approach to disease, health and the body. This article analyses the thesis of 'geneticization'. Explaining the implications of the thesis, and discussing the critical refutations, it is argued that 'geneticization' primarily is a heuristic tool that can help to re-focus the moral debate on the implications of new genetic knowledge towards interpersonal relations, the power of medicine, the cultural context and social constraints, rather than emphasizing issues as personal autonomy and individual rights.

Indexed as

BioethicsCultureGeneticsEmpirical ResearchGenetic DeterminismGenetic ResearchGenetics, MedicalGenome, HumanHumansAnalytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionPhilosophical Approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.