Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11758680›Full record

ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease2001

Is genotype determination useful in predicting the clinical phenotype in lysosomal storage diseases?

I Maire

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proteomics of the lysosome.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2009
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Chemical chaperones increase the cellular activity of N370S beta -glucosidase: a therapeutic strategy for Gaucher disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

I MaireService de Biochimie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Debrousse, Lyon, France. irene.maire@chu-lyon.fr
Hôpital Debrousse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between genotype and clinical phenotype will clearly aid in the prognosis, treatment and counselling of patients with lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs). This, however, will require the establishment of widely accepted indices with which to score the severity of LSDs, as these diseases are characterized by their marked clinical heterogeneity. Even in the complete absence of a functional enzyme, presentation may be variable, depending on the patient's genetic background and on a range of epigenetic and environmental factors. Further difficulties in predicting disease severity and progression from the genotype arise from the rarity of these disorders, the low enzyme levels required for a normal phenotype and the relative lack of understanding of the pathophysiology of LSDs.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionGenotypeHumansLysosomal Storage DiseasesPhenotypePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID11758680
OpenAlexW171006302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.