Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11756672›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2002

Short interspersed transposable elements (SINEs) are excluded from imprinted regions in the human genome.

John M Greally

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic imprinting: recognition and marking of imprinted loci.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John M GreallyDepartment of Medicine (Hematology), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Ullmann 925, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. jgreally@aecom.yu.edu
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

MATRIX ATTACHMENT REGIONS IN AN IMPRINTED DOMAINK08DK002467 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI GREALLY, JOHN · 1997 to 2001
$255k
TRANSGENIC TESTING OF THE 15Q11 Q13 IMPRINTING CENTRER03DK056786 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI GREALLY, JOHN · 2000 to 2001
$166k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK02467NIDDK NIH HHS DK56786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To test whether regions undergoing genomic imprinting have unique genomic characteristics, imprinted and nonimprinted human loci were compared for nucleotide and retroelement composition. Maternally and paternally expressed subgroups of imprinted genes were found to differ in terms of guanine and cytosine, CpG, and retroelement content, indicating a segregation into distinct genomic compartments. Imprinted regions have been normally permissive to L1 long interspersed transposable element retroposition during mammalian evolution but universally and significantly lack short interspersed transposable elements (SINEs). The primate-specific Alu SINEs, as well as the more ancient mammalian-wide interspersed repeat SINEs, are found at significantly low densities in imprinted regions. The latter paleogenomic signature indicates that the sequence characteristics of currently imprinted regions existed before the mammalian radiation. Transitions from imprinted to nonimprinted genomic regions in cis are characterized by a sharp inflection in SINE content, demonstrating that this genomic characteristic can help predict the presence and extent of regions undergoing imprinting. During primate evolution, SINE accumulation in imprinted regions occurred at a decreased rate compared with control loci. The constraint on SINE accumulation in imprinted regions may be mediated by an active selection process. This selection could be because of SINEs attracting and spreading methylation, as has been found at other loci. Methylation-induced silencing could lead to deleterious consequences at imprinted loci, where inactivation of one allele is already established, and expression is often essential for embryonic growth and survival.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanGenomic ImprintingCpG IslandsCytosineDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularGuanineHumansModels, GeneticOpen Reading FramesRetroelementsSequence Analysis, DNAShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsTime FactorsCytosineDNA Transposable ElementsGuanineRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID11756672
PMCPMC117560
OpenAlexW2072204610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.