Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11747340›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2001

E-cadherin as a prognostic indicator in primary breast cancer.

C Parker, R S Rampaul, S E Pinder, J A Bell, P M Wencyk, R W Blamey, R I Nicholson, J F Robertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MDA-7/IL-24 inhibits cell survival by inducing apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Prognostic Value of E-cadherin Expression in Breast Cancer.International journal of health sciences · 2007
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C ParkerDepartment of Histopathology, University Of Nottingham, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NHS Trust.
R S Rampaul
S E Pinder
J A Bell
P M Wencyk
R W Blamey
R I Nicholson
J F Robertson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial cadherin (E-CD) is a member of the cadherin family of cell adhesion molecules and has been implicated as an invasion suppressor molecule in vitro and in vivo. We analysed 174 breast tumours from the Nottingham/Tenovus Breast Cancer Series immunohistochemically for E-CD expression using the mouse monoclonal antibody HECD-1 (Zymed Laboratories Inc.). In normal epithelial cells E-CD was strongly expressed at cell-cell boundaries. 66% of the breast cancers examined had reduced intensity of E-CD expression with 74% having significant reductions in the proportion of E-CD-positive tumour cells. Using a combined intensity/proportion score, significant associations were found between E-CD expression and tumour type (P </= 0.001). ER status (P = 0.026) and histological grade (P = 0.031). Expression of E-CD was not found to be related to recurrence, distant metastases, lymph node stage, vascular invasion, primary tumour size, prognostic group or survival. Thus E-CD expression in human breast cancer appears to have minimal prognostic value, but may have a role as a phenotypic marker.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCadherinsCarcinomaCohort StudiesCytoplasmFemaleHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesLife TablesMiceMiddle AgedAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11747340
PMCPMC2364028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.