ArticleThe Journal of physiology2001
Effects of substituting uridine triphosphate for ATP on the crossbridge cycle of rabbit muscle.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of the interaction of the nucleotide base with myosin and the effect on substrate efficacy.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
- Inhibition of myosin light-chain phosphorylation inverts the birefringence response of porcine airway smooth muscle.The Journal of physiology · 2007Article
- Kinetics of muscle contraction and actomyosin NTP hydrolysis from rabbit using a series of metal-nucleotide substrates.The Journal of physiology · 2005Article
- Molecular dynamics analysis of structural factors influencing back door pi release in myosin.Biophysical journal · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Substituting uridine triphosphate (UTP) for ATP as a substrate for rabbit skeletal myosin and actin at 4 degrees C slowed the dissociation of myosin-S1 from actin by threefold, and hydrolysis of the nucleotide by sevenfold, without a decrease in the rates of phosphate or uridine diphosphate dissociation from actomyosin. 2. The same substitution in skinned rabbit psoas fibres at 2-3 degrees C reduced the maximum shortening velocity by 56 % and increased the force asymptote of the force-velocity curve relative to force (alpha/P(o)) by 112 % without altering the velocity asymptote, beta. It also decreased isometric force by 35 % and isometric stiffness by 20 %, so that the stiffness/force ratio was increased by 23 %. 3. Tension transient experiments showed that the stiffness/force increase was associated with a 10 % reduction in the amplitude of the rapid, partial (phase 2) recovery relative to the isometric force, and the addition of two new components, one that recovered at a step-size-independent rate of 100 s(-1) and another that did not recover following the length change. 4. The increased alpha/P(o) with constant beta suggests an internal load, as expected of attached crossbridges detained in their movement. An increased stiffness/force ratio suggests a greater fraction of attached bridges in low-force states, as expected of bridges with unhydrolyzed UTP detained in low-force states. Decreased phase 2 recovery suggests the detention of high-force bridges, as expected of slowed actomyosin dissociation by nucleotide. 5. These results suggest that the separation of hydrolysed phosphates from nucleotides occurs early in the attached phase of the crossbridge cycle, near and possibly identical to a transition to a firmly attached, low-force state from an initial state where bridges with hydrolysed nucleotides are easily detached by shortening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.