Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11744503›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2001

Wildlife as sentinels of human health effects in the Great Lakes--St. Lawrence basin.

G A Fox

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Environmental Assessment for Sustainability and Resiliency for Ecological and Human Health.Journal of environmental studies (Northborough, Mass.) · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. An overview of the effects of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds on vertebrates, as documented in human and ecological epidemiology.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

G A FoxCanadian Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Centre, Hull, Quebec, Canada. glen.fox@ec.gc.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no existing formal, long-term program for gathering evidence of the incidence and severity of the health effects of toxic substances in wildlife. However, research-based studies of bald eagles, herring gulls, night herons, tree swallows, snapping turtles, mink, and beluga over the past 30 years have revealed a broad spectrum of health effects in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence basin including thyroid and other endocrine disorders, metabolic diseases, altered immune function, reproductive impairment, developmental toxicity, genotoxicity, and cancer. These effects occurred most often and were most severe in the most contaminated sites (Green Bay, Saginaw Bay, Lake Ontario, the St. Lawrence estuary, and more recently, Lake Erie), some of which are International Joint Commission-designated Areas of Concern (AOCs). In all cases, a strong argument can be made for an environmental etiology, and in many cases for the involvement of persistent organic pollutants, particularly polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzo-(italic)p(/italic)-dioxins, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. For some, the association with particular contaminants is consistent with controlled studies, and in some, dose-response relationships were documented. The biologic significance of these health impairments to the affected species is currently unclear, but they resemble those observed with increased incidence in human subpopulations in one or more AOCs. Formalizing health effects monitoring of sentinel wildlife species by the parties to the Canada-USA Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement is required. This would facilitate the optimal use of sentinel wildlife health data in a larger, epidemiologic weight-of-evidence context upon which to base decisions and policies regarding the effects of chemical exposures on human populations.

Indexed as

Animals, WildEnvironmental ExposureFood ChainPublic HealthAnimalsBiomarkersBirdsData CollectionEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsGreat Lakes RegionHumansPolicy MakingPolychlorinated BiphenylsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWhalesBiomarkersEnvironmental PollutantsPolychlorinated BiphenylsPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID11744503
PMCPMC1240620
OpenAlexW2020563663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.