ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2002
The classification of pericardial disease in the age of modern medicine.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A case of Meigs' syndrome with preceding pericardial effusion in advance of pleural effusion.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2016Article
- Is acute idiopathic pericarditis associated with recent upper respiratory tract infection or gastroenteritis? A case-control study.BMJ open · 2015Article
- Oxygen demand of perfused heart preparations: how electromechanical function and inadequate oxygenation affect physiology and optical measurements.Experimental physiology · 2015Review
- Treatment with aspirin, NSAID, corticosteroids, and colchicine in acute and recurrent pericarditis.Heart failure reviews · 2013Review
- First report of infectious pericarditis due to Bordetella holmesii in an adult patient with malignant lymphoma.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Pericarditis and pericardial effusion: management update.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2011Article
- Pleuritic chest pain in a patient who had undergone recent surgical repair of a patent foramen ovale.Internal and emergency medicine · 2006Article
- Practical aspects of the management of pericardial disease.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2003Review
- Treatment of Pericardial Effusion Through Subxiphoid Tube Pericardiostomy and Computerized Tomography- or Echocardiography - Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Methods.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spectrum of pericardial diseases comprises pericarditis, pericardial neoplasms, cysts, and congenital defects. Due to the insufficient diagnostic value of standard, noninvasive diagnostic techniques, many cases remained etiologically unclear, and were therefore classified as idiopathic. A major improvement in the classification of pericardial disease is its clear distinction between the two most frequent forms of idiopathic pericarditis: viral infection and autoreactive pericarditis. This classification has major therapeutic consequences. In autoreactive forms, systemic and intrapericardial corticosteroid treatment has a favorable effect; its application in viral forms is contraindicated. The new classification of pericardial diseases synthesizes the achievements of modern imaging with molecular biology and immunology. Systematic implementation of new techniques of pericardial fluid analyses, pericardioscopy and pericardial biopsy, and the application of molecular biology and immunology techniques have opened new windows to the pericardial diseases, permitting early specific diagnosis, and creating foundations for etiologic treatment in many cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.