Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11743005›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2001

Nucleosome positioning at the replication fork.

R Lucchini, R E Wellinger, J M Sogo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanisms of chromatin-based epigenetic inheritance.Science China. Life sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Measuring the buffering capacity of gene silencing inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Single-Molecule Techniques to Study Chromatin.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DNA looping mediates nucleosome transfer.Nature communications · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Postreplicative mismatch repair.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. CAF-I-dependent control of degradation of the discontinuous strands during mismatch repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R LucchiniInstitute of Cell Biology, ETH Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
R E Wellinger
J M Sogo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to determine the time required for nucleosomes assembled on the daughter strands of replication forks to assume favoured positions with respect to DNA sequence, psoralen cross-linked replication intermediates purified from preparative two-dimensional agarose gels were analysed by exonuclease digestion or primer extension. Analysis of sites of psoralen intercalation revealed that nucleosomes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae rDNA intergenic spacer are positioned shortly after passage of the replication machinery. Therefore, both the 'old' randomly segregated nucleosomes as well as the 'new' assembled histone octamers rapidly position themselves (within seconds) on the newly replicated DNA strands, suggesting that the positioning of nucleosomes is an initial step in the chromatin maturation process.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationBase SequenceChromatinDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalExonucleasesNucleosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeChromatinDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalExonucleasesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID11743005
PMCPMC125336
OpenAlexW1976040047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.