Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11743002›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2001

Mechanism of maturase-promoted group II intron splicing.

M Matsuura, J W Noah, A M Lambowitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The ChloroplastCells · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Retroelement origins of pre-mRNA splicing.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M MatsuuraInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
J W Noah
A M Lambowitz
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

RETROPLASMID AND GROUP II INTRON REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASESR01GM037949 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI LAMBOWITZ, ALAN M. · 1986 to 2019
$8.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM37949NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile group II introns encode reverse transcriptases that also function as intron-specific splicing factors (maturases). We showed previously that the reverse transcriptase/maturase encoded by the Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB intron has a high affinity binding site at the beginning of its own coding region in an idiosyncratic structure, DIVa. Here, we identify potential secondary binding sites in conserved regions of the catalytic core and show via chemical modification experiments that binding of the maturase induces the formation of key tertiary interactions required for RNA splicing. The interaction with conserved as well as idiosyncratic regions explains how maturases in some organisms could evolve into general group II intron splicing factors, potentially mirroring a key step in the evolution of spliceosomal introns.

Indexed as

IntronsRNA SplicingSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAldehydesBase SequenceButanonesIodineMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseaI2 protein, S cerevisiaeAldehydesButanonesIodinekethoxalRNARNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11743002
PMCPMC125332
OpenAlexW2050396617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.