Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11742069›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

Role of the C-terminal domain in inactivation of brain and cardiac sodium channels.

M Mantegazza, F H Yu, W A Catterall, T Scheuer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural basis of human NaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. NaStructure (London, England : 1993) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Detection of NaBiophysical journal · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M MantegazzaDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
F H Yu
W A Catterall
T Scheuer
University of Washington · US

Funding

MODULATION OF SODIUM CHANNELS BY G PROTEINSR29NS034801 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SCHEUER, TODD · 1997 to 2001
$255k
NINDS NIH HHS NS34801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactivation is a fundamental characteristic of Na(+) channels, and small changes cause skeletal muscle paralysis and myotonia, epilepsy, and cardiac arrhythmia. Brain Na(v)1.2a channels have faster inactivation than cardiac Na(v)1.5 channels, but minor differences in inactivation gate structure are not responsible. We constructed chimeras in which the C termini beyond the fourth homologous domains of Na(v)1.2a and Na(v)1.5 were exchanged. Replacing the C-terminal domain (CT) of Na(v)1.2a with that of Na(v)1.5 (Na(v)1.2/1.5CT) slowed inactivation at +40 mV approximately 2-fold, making it similar to Na(v)1.5. Conversely, replacing the CT of Na(v)1.5 with that of Na(v)1.2a (Nav1.5/1.2CT) accelerated inactivation, making it similar to Na(v)1.2a. Activation properties were unaffected. The voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation of Na(v)1.5 is 16 mV more negative than that of Na(v)1.2a. The steady-state inactivation curve of Na(v)1.2a was shifted +12 mV in Na(v)1.2/1.5CT, consistent with destabilization of the inactivated state. Conversely, Na(v)1.5/1.2CT was shifted -14 mV relative to Na(v)1.5, consistent with stabilization of the inactivated state. Although these effects of exchanging C termini were consistent with their effects on inactivation kinetics, they magnified the differences in the voltage dependence of inactivation between brain and cardiac channels rather than transferring them. Thus, other parts of these channels determine the basal difference in steady-state inactivation. Deletion of the distal half of either the Na(v)1.2 or Na(v)1.5 CTs accelerated open-state inactivation and negatively shifted steady-state inactivation. Thus, the C terminus has a strong influence on kinetics and voltage dependence of inactivation in brain Na(v)1.2 and cardiac Na(v)1.5 channels and is primarily responsible for their differing rates of channel inactivation.

Indexed as

BrainCell LineHumansKineticsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMyocardiumPatch-Clamp TechniquesSequence DeletionSodium ChannelsSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID11742069
PMCPMC65032
OpenAlexW1986688964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.