Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11741263›Full record

ArticleAAPS pharmSci2001

Evolutionary relationships among G protein-coupled receptors using a clustered database approach.

R C Graul, W Sadée

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS pharmSci, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Insight into Evolution and Conservation Patterns of B1-Subfamily Members of GPCR.International journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. On the analysis of ligand-directed signaling at G protein-coupled receptors.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2008
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Availability of short amino acid sequences in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2005
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Construction of a sequence motif characteristic of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2003
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R C GraulIncyte Genomics, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
W Sadée
Incyte (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

MUTATIONS OF MUSCARINIC CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR GENESR01GM043102 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI SADEE, WOLFGANG · 1990 to 2001
$398k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM43102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise large and diverse gene families in fungi, plants, and the animal kingdom. GPCRs appear to share a common structure with 7 transmembrane segments, but sequence similarity is minimal among the most distant GPCRs. To reevaluate the question of evolutionary relationships among the disparate GPCR families, this study takes advantage of the dramatically increased number of cloned GPCRs. Sequences were selected from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant peptide database using iterative BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) searches to yield a database of approximately 1700 GPCRs and unrelated membrane proteins as controls, divided into 34 distinct clusters. For each cluster, separate position-specific matrices were established to optimize sequence comparisons among GPCRs. This approach resulted in significant alignments between distant GPCR families, including receptors for the biogenic amine/peptide, VIP/secretin, cAMP, STE3/MAP3 fungal pheromones, latrophilin, developmental receptors frizzled and smoothened, as well as the more distant metabotrobic glutamate receptors, the STE2/MAM2 fungal pheromone receptors, and GPR1, a fungal glucose receptor. On the other hand, alignment scores between these recognized GPCR clades with p40 (putative GPCR) and pm1 (putative GPCR), as well as bacteriorhodopsins, failed to support a finding of homology. This study provides a refined view of GPCR ancestry and serves as a reference database with hyperlinks to other sources. Moreover, it may facilitate database annotation and the assignment of orphan receptors to GPCR families.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCluster AnalysisDatabases, ProteinEvolution, MolecularFungiGTP-Binding ProteinsHumansInternetMembrane ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceSequence AlignmentGTP-Binding ProteinsMembrane ProteinsReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID11741263
PMCPMC2779559
OpenAlexW2084430953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.