ReviewPaediatric drugs2001
Acute renal failure in children: aetiology and management.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Approaches to the Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Children.Recent patents on biomarkers · 2011Article
- Pitfalls, prevention, and treatment of hyperuricemia during tumor lysis syndrome in the era of rasburicase (recombinant urate oxidase).Biologics : targets & therapy · 2008Article
- Prognosis of acute renal failure in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2006Article
- Diuretics in pediatrics : current knowledge and future prospects.Paediatric drugs · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review evaluates the various causes and management of acute renal failure (ARF) in children. ARF is defined as an abrupt decline in the renal regulation of water, electrolytes and acid-base balance, and continues to be an important factor contributing to the morbidity and mortality of critically ill infants and children. The common causes of ARF in children include acute tubular necrosis secondary to various causes (including congestive heart failure and sepsis), haemolytic uremic syndrome, and glomerulonephritis and urinary tract obstruction. Ischaemia, toxins (including drugs) as well as primary parenchymal disease, have to be considered and ARF can also be a complication of systemic disease. The basic principles of management are avoidance of life-threatening complications, maintenance of fluid and electrolyte balance, and nutritional support. Only a few patients require specific management of the underlying disorder, although it is important to diagnose these conditions. Knowledge about the use of drugs for the prevention of ARF is scarce. Mannitol, low-dose dopamine, calcium channel antagonists, atrial natriuretic peptide and albumin have been evaluated and, where possible, meta-analyses are cited. Mannitol treatment appears to be warranted prophylactically after paediatric renal transplantation. Albumin infusion can reverse prerenal ARF in children with nephritic syndrome. For treatment of the complications of hyperkalaemia and volume overload, salbutamol, insulin and glucose infusion and diuretics such as furosemide and sodium bicarbonate, are discussed. All of the major dialysis modalities (peritoneal dialysis, haemodialysis and continuous haemofiltration) can be used to provide equivalent solute clearance and ultrafiltration. The indication for, and the choice of the modality depend on the patient requirements and on local resources, and should involve the care of a paediatric nephrologist. Peritoneal dialysis requires minimal equipment and infrastructure, is easy to perform and remains the favoured modality of renal replacement therapy in children. However, continuous haemofiltration is an excellent alternative to peritoneal dialysis in patients with ARF and severe fluid overload. Dialysis remains the most important tool to bridge the time needed for recovery of renal function. There is increasing evidence that more intense use of dialysis may improve the overall prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.