Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11735609›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2001

Delivery of neurotrophic factors to the central nervous system: pharmacokinetic considerations.

R G Thorne, W H Frey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 480 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Disruption of BDNF signalling in neuropathologies.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  10. Patent analysis of mRNA therapy using deep learning.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Toward an NGF-based therapy for Rett syndrome.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Nanomedicine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: bypassing the blood-brain barrier with cutting-edge nanotechnology.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R G ThorneDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
W H Frey
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurotrophic factors are proteins with considerable potential in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases and traumatic injuries. However, a significant challenge to their clinical use is the difficulty associated with delivering these proteins to the CNS. Neurotrophic factors are hydrophilic, typically basic, monomeric or dimeric proteins, mostly in the size range of 5 to 30 kDa. Neurotrophic factors potently support the development, growth and survival of neurons, eliciting biological effects at concentrations in the nanomolar to femtomolar range. They are not orally bioavailable and the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers severely limit their ability to enter into and act on sites in the CNS following parenteral systemic routes of administration. Most neurotrophic factors have short in vivo half-lives and poor pharmacokinetic profiles. Their access to the CNS is restricted by rapid enzymatic inactivation, multiple clearance processes, potential immunogenicity and sequestration by binding proteins and other components of the blood and peripheral tissues. The development of targeted drug delivery strategies for neurotrophic factors will probably determine their clinical effectiveness for CNS conditions. Achieving significant CNS target site concentrations while limiting systemic exposure and distribution to peripheral sites of action will lessen unwanted pleiotropic effects and toxicity. Local introduction of neurotrophic factors into the CNS intraparenchymally by direct injection/infusion or by implantation of delivery vectors such as polymer matrices or genetically modified cells yields the highest degree of targeting, but is limited by diffusion restrictions and invasiveness. Delivery of neurotrophic factors into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) following intracerebroventricular or intrathecal administration is less invasive and allows access to a much wider area of the CNS through CSF circulation pathways. However, diffusional and cellular barriers to penetration into surrounding CNS tissue and significant clearance of CSF into the venous and lymphatic circulation are also limiting. Unconventional delivery strategies such as intranasal administration may offer some degree of CNS targeting with minimal invasiveness. This review presents a summary of the neurotrophic factors and their indications for CNS disorders, their physicochemical characteristics and the different approaches that have been attempted or suggested for their delivery to the CNS. Future directions for further research such as the potential for CNS disease treatment utilising combinations of neurotrophic factors, displacement strategies, small molecule mimetics, chimaeric molecules and gene therapy are also discussed.

Indexed as

Nerve Growth FactorsAnimalsCentral Nervous System DiseasesDrug CombinationsHumansDrug CombinationsNerve Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID11735609
OpenAlexW1973304468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.