Cerebral palsy--medicolegal aspects.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010
   Pooled it
2. Periventricular leukomalacia-related litigation in Japan: a qualitative analysis of causation under clinical uncertainty.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
   Article
3. Maternal and fetal Acid-base chemistry: a major determinant of perinatal outcome.Annals of medical and health sciences research · 2014
   Review
4. Cerebral palsy: comprehensive review and update.Annals of Saudi medicine
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as