Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11732314›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2001

Plant calcium signaling and monitoring: pros and cons and recent experimental approaches.

C Plieth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inter-Organellar CaCells · 2025
    Review
  2. Cell Type-Specific Imaging of Calcium Signaling inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Calcium Signals from the Vacuole.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ca2+ signatures: the role of Ca2+-ATPases.Plant signaling & behavior · 2009
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

C PliethZentrum für Biochemie und Molekularbiologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118 Kiel, Federal Republic of Germany. cplieth@zbm.uni-kiel.de
Kiel University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focusses on Ca(2+)-mediated plant cell signaling and optical methods for in vivo [Ca2+] monitoring and imaging in plants. The cytosolic free calcium concentration has long been considered the central cellular key in plants. However, more and more data are turning up that critically question this view. Conflicting arguments show that there are still many open questions. One conclusion is that the cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration is just one of many cellular network parameters orchestrating complex cellular signaling. Novel experimental strategies which unveil interference of cellular parameters and communication of transduction pathways are required to understand this network. To date only optical methods are able to provide both kinetic and spatial information about cellular key parameters simultaneously. Focussing on calcium there are currently three classes of calcium indicators employed (i.e., chemical fluorescent dyes, luminescent indicators, and green-fluorescent-protein-based indicators). Properties and capabilities as well as advantages and disadvantages of these indicators when used in plant systems are discussed. Finally, general experimental strategies are mentioned which are able to answer open questions raised here.

Indexed as

Plant Physiological PhenomenaAequorinArabidopsisCalciumCalcium SignalingElectrophysiologyFluorescent DyesLightPhysical StimulationPlant RootsPlants, Genetically ModifiedRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAequorinCalciumFluorescent DyesRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11732314
OpenAlexW1965421260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.