Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11732063›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2001

The cytoskeleton and spatial control of cytokinesis in the plant life cycle.

R C Brown, B E Lemmon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TON1 and FASS are required to recruit myosin VIII, a cell division guidance factor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Syncytia in Utricularia: Origin and Structure.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cytokinesis in plant male meiosis.Plant signaling & behavior · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R C BrownDepartment of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, LA 70504-2451, USA. rcb@louisiana.edu
B E Lemmon
University of Louisiana at Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the intriguing aspects of development in plants is the precise control of division plane and subsequent placement of walls resulting in the specific architecture of tissues and organs. The placement of walls can be directed by either of two microtubule cycles. The better known microtubule cycle is associated with control of the future division plane in meristematic growth where new cells become part of tissues. The future daughter domains are determined before the nucleus enters prophase and the future site of cytokinesis is marked by a preprophase band (PPB) of cortical microtubules. The spindle axis is then organized in accordance with the PPB and, following chromosome movement, a phragmoplast is initiated in the interzone and expands to join with parental walls at the site previously occupied by the PPB. The alternative microtubule cycle lacks both the hooplike cortical microtubules of interphase and the PPB. Wall placement is determined by a radial microtubule system that defines a domain of cytoplasm either containing a nucleus or destined to contain a nucleus (the nuclear cytoplasmic domain) and controls wall placement at its perimeter. This more flexible system allows for cytoplasmic polarization and migration of nuclei in coenocytes prior to cellularization. The uncoupling of cytokinesis from karyokinesis is a regular feature of the reproductive phase in plants and results in specific, often unusual, patterns of cells which reflect the position of nuclei at the time of cellularization (e.g., the arrangement of spores in a tetrad, cells of the male and female gametophytes of angiosperms, and the distinctive cellularization of endosperm). Thus, both microtubule cycles are required for completion of plant life cycles from bryophytes to angiosperms. In angiosperm seed development, the two methods of determining the boundaries of domains where walls will be deposited are operative side by side. Whereas the PPB cycle drives embryo development, the radial-microtubule-system cycle drives the common nuclear type of endosperm development from the syncytial stage through cellularization. However, a switch to the PPB cycle can occur in endosperm, as it does in barley, when peripheral cells divide to produce a multilayered aleurone. The triggers for the switch between microtubule cycles, which are currently unknown, are key to understanding plant development.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionArabidopsisCytoskeletonImmunohistochemistryMeristemMicrotubulesMitosis

Identifiers

PMID11732063
OpenAlexW2031152175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.