ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2001
Comparison of GP IIB/IIIA inhibitors and their activity as measured by aggregometry, flow cytometry, single platelet counting, and the rapid platelet function analyzer.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Humanized mouse model of thrombosis is predictive of the clinical efficacy of antiplatelet agents.Circulation · 2011Article
- Inhibition of platelet function by abciximab or high-dose tirofiban in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: a randomised trial.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2007Article
- Effects of different thrombolytic treatment regimen with abciximab and tirofiban on platelet aggregation and platelet-leukocyte interactions: a subgroup analysis from the GUSTO V and FASTER trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have primarily been used short-term e.g., during PTCA. They failed to show clinical benefit during long-term therapy. One reason might be the absence of a method to monitor inhibitor activity. This study compared platelet aggregometry, the rapid platelet function analyzer (RPFA) test, single platelet counting, and flow cytometric determination of receptor occupancy to measure GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitor activity.
methodsIncreasing doses of abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide were added to whole blood in vitro. Whole blood was used for the RPFA, for single platelet counting and flow cytometry. Platelet rich plasma was prepared for aggregometry.
resultsThe correlation between aggregometry and RPFA results was linear for abciximab and eptifibatide. Tirofiban was a stronger inhibitor with the RPFA (IC(50) 7.7nM) than with aggregometry (IC(50) 19.6nM). The single platelet counting technique showed that even supratherapeutic concentrations of all three inhibitors could not completely suppress microaggregation. Abciximab concentrations that were equipotent to tirofiban with aggregometry were less potent with regards to the inhibition of microaggregation. This difference was more pronounced with TRAP induced microaggregation than with ADP. The flow cytometric receptor occupancy test showed that occupancy was 95% with 5 microg/ml abciximab and almost 97% with 10 microg/ml. Tirofiban reached a maximum receptor occupancy of 56%, eptifibatide 64%.
conclusionsWhile aggregometry is time consuming the RPFA provides results fast and with little variability. There is still a discrepancy between aggregometry and RPFA results for tirofiban. The single platelet counting technique detects the inhibition of microaggregation the relevance of which for the clinical outcome is not known. The flow cytometric receptor occupancy assay is best suited for abciximab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.