ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2001
Determining binding sites in protein-nucleic acid complexes by cross-saturation.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- NMR as a "Gold Standard" Method in Drug Design and Discovery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Competitive and cooperative interactions mediate RNA transfer from herpesvirus saimiri ORF57 to the mammalian export adaptor ALYREF.PLoS pathogens · 2014Article
- Specific RNA-protein interactions detected with saturation transfer difference NMR.RNA biology · 2013Article
- DNA-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2012Review
- Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of protein-DNA interactions.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2011Review
- Solution structure of the nonmethyl-CpG-binding CXXC domain of the leukaemia-associated MLL histone methyltransferase.The EMBO journal · 2006Article
- Utilization of methyl proton resonances in cross-saturation measurement for determining the interfaces of large protein-protein complexes.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2006Article
- Structure, dynamics and interactions of p47, a major adaptor of the AAA ATPase, p97.The EMBO journal · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-saturation experiments have been shown to give accurate information regarding the interacting surfaces in protein-protein and protein-RNA complexes. The rate of magnetization transfer depends on a number of factors including geometry, spin topology, and effective correlation times. To assess the influence of these variables on such experiments, and to determine the range of applicability of the technique, we have simulated the time-course of magnetization transfer across the interface in a variety of protein-nucleic acid complexes (434 Cro, SRY, MetJ and U1A), each having a different binding geometry. The simulations have been carried out primarily to provide information about the experimentally accessible targets for selective saturation, such as the anomeric protons and the imino protons of the nucleic acid. Saturation of either of these groups of signals leads to partial excitation throughout the nucleic acid molecule, and the resulting transfer of saturation to the labelled protein moiety can be readily detected by the reduction in intensity of particular peaks in the HSQC spectrum of the protein. The simulations show that information can be obtained about the residues in contact with the nucleic acid without any need for deuteration. Experimental cross-saturation data have been obtained from the Mbp1-DNA complex and interpreted in conjunction with the simulations to map out the binding surface in detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.