ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2001
Na(+) interaction with the pore of Shaker B K(+) channels: zero and low K(+) conditions.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conductance stability and Na+ interaction with Shab K+ channels under low K+ conditions.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2021Article
- Article
- Quinidine interaction with Shab K+ channels: pore block and irreversible collapse of the K+ conductance.The Journal of physiology · 2010Article
- Voltage-dependent C-type inactivation in a constitutively open K+ channel.Biophysical journal · 2008Article
- Stability of the Shab K+ channel conductance in 0 K+ solutions: the role of the membrane potential.Biophysical journal · 2007Article
- K+-dependent stability and ion conduction of Shab K+ channels: a comparison with Shaker channels.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2005Article
- Inhibition of the collapse of the Shaker K+ conductance by specific scorpion toxins.The Journal of general physiology · 2004Article
- Interaction of local anesthetics with the K (+) channel pore domain: KcsA as a model for drug-dependent tetramer stability.Channels (Austin, Tex.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Shaker B K(+) conductance (G(K)) collapses (in a reversible manner) if the membrane is depolarized and then repolarized in, 0 K(+), Na(+)-containing solutions (Gómez-Lagunas, F. 1997. J. Physiol. 499:3-15; Gómez-Lagunas, F. 1999. Biophys. J. 77:2988-2998). In this work, the role of Na(+) ions in the collapse of G(K) in 0-K(+) solutions, and in the behavior of the channels in low K(+) was studied. The main findings are as follows. First, in 0-K(+) solutions, the presence of Na(+) ions is an important factor that speeds the collapse of G(K). Second, external Na(+) fosters the drop of G(K) by binding to a site with a K(d) = 3.3 mM. External K(+) competes, in a mutually exclusive manner, with Na(o)(+) for binding to this site, with an estimated K(d) = 80 microM. Third, NMG and choline are relatively inert regarding the stability of G(K); fourth, with [K(o)(+)] = 0, the energy required to relieve Na(i)(+) block of Shaker (French, R.J., and J.B. Wells. 1977. J. Gen. Physiol. 70:707-724; Starkus, J.G., L. Kuschel, M. Rayner, and S. Heinemann. 2000. J. Gen. Physiol. 110:539-550) decreases with the molar fraction of Na(i)(+) (X(Na,i)), in an extent not accounted for by the change in Delta(mu)(Na). Finally, when X(Na,i) = 1, G(K) collapses by the binding of Na(i)(+) to two sites, with apparent K(d)s of 2 and 14.3 mM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.