Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11722689›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2001

Problematic resident-patient relationships: the patient' s perspective.

C Boutin-Foster, M E Charlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Taking care of patients in resident clinics: where do we stand?Journal of general internal medicine · 2001
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C Boutin-FosterDepartment of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA. cboutin@med.cornell.edu
M E Charlson

Funding

Weill Cornell Training Program in Health Services ResearchT32HS000066 · AHRQ · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHARLSON, MARY E · 1994 to 2018
$4.7M
AHRQ HHS HS00066-06AHRQ HHS T32 HS000066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of the study were to identify the characteristics of a problematic doctor-patient relationship from the perspective of primary care patients who are cared for by medical residents and to determine whether patients' perception of the relationship is a function of their demographic, clinical, or social attributes.

designCross-sectional survey.

settingAn adult primary care practice in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-one patients whose primary care physicians were senior internal medicine residents. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPatients completed a questionnaire addressing several aspects of their doctor-patient relationship, the general health perception item on the SF-12, and items on social support from the Duke Social Support and Stress Scale. By design of the study, approximately half of the patients had been identified by their physicians as being in problematic relationships (n = 74) and half as being in satisfying relationships (n = 77). Among patients in relationships described as satisfying by their resident, 10% viewed the relationship as problematic. Of the patients involved in relationships described as problematic by the resident, 23% viewed their relationship as problematic (P = .03). Patients who rated the relationship as problematic were much more likely to also report low social support compared to patients involved in relationships described as satisfying (76% vs 16%; P < .001). Compared to residents involved in relationships described as satisfying by their patients, residents in problematic relationships were more likely to be described as being less accessible and less capable of handling medical complaints (P < . 001).

conclusionsPatients were more likely to describe the doctor-patient relationship as problematic if they felt that the resident was less accessible or less capable of handling medical complaints, or if they had low self-perceived social support.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPerceptionPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesEmpirical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Identifiers

PMID11722689
PMCPMC1495294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.