ArticleBiophysical journal2001
Aspiration of human neutrophils: effects of shear thinning and cortical dissipation.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilizing High-Throughput Screening of dHL-60 Inflammatory Behaviors to Evaluate Honey-Derived Molecules' Potential as Immunomodulatory Biomaterial Additives.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Characterization of cellular wound resistance in the giant ciliatebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A computational model for the transit of a cancer cell through a constricted microchannel.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2023Article
- Activation effects on the physical characteristics of T lymphocytes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- A computational modeling of invadopodia protrusion into an extracellular matrix fiber network.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Computational estimates of mechanical constraints on cell migration through the extracellular matrix.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Characterization of cytoplasmic viscosity of hundreds of single tumour cells based on micropipette aspiration.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- High-throughput single-cell rheology in complex samples by dynamic real-time deformability cytometry.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Modeling of adhesion, protrusion, and contraction coordination for cell migration simulations.Journal of mathematical biology · 2014Article
- Characterizing deformability and surface friction of cancer cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Dynamic modeling of cell migration and spreading behaviors on fibronectin coated planar substrates and micropatterned geometries.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Leukocyte rolling on P-selectin: a three-dimensional numerical study of the effect of cytoplasmic viscosity.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Local rheology of human neutrophils investigated using atomic force microscopy.International journal of biological sciences · 2011Article
- Article
- Analysis of actin FLAP dynamics in the leading lamella.PloS one · 2010Article
- Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: the force journey of a tumor cell.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2009Review
- Role of E-cadherin in membrane-cortex interaction probed by nanotube extrusion.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
- Baseline mechanical characterization of J774 macrophages.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
- Mechanical and biochemical modeling of cortical oscillations in spreading cells.Biophysical journal · 2008Article
- Fast fluorescence laser tracking microrheometry. I: instrument development.Biophysical journal · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is generally accepted that the human neutrophil can be mechanically represented as a droplet of polymeric fluid enclosed by some sort of thin slippery viscoelastic cortex. Many questions remain however about the detailed rheology and chemistry of the interior fluid and the cortex. To address these quantitative issues, we have used a finite element method to simulate the dynamics of neutrophils during micropipet aspiration using various plausible assumptions. The results were then systematically compared with aspiration experiments conducted at eight different combinations of pipet size and pressure. Models in which the cytoplasm was represented by a simple Newtonian fluid (i.e., models without shear thinning) were grossly incapable of accounting for the effects of pressure on the general time scale of neutrophil aspiration. Likewise, models in which the cortex was purely elastic (i.e., models without surface viscosity) were unable to explain the effects of pipet size on the general aspiration rate. Such models also failed to explain the rapid acceleration of the aspiration rate during the final phase of aspiration nor could they account for the geometry of the neutrophil during various phases of aspiration. Thus, our results indicate that a minimal mechanical model of the neutrophil needs to incorporate both shear thinning and surface viscosity to remain valid over a reasonable range of conditions. At low shear rates, the surface dilatation viscosity of the neutrophil was found to be on the order of 100 poise-cm, whereas the viscosity of the interior cytoplasm was on the order of 1000 poise. Both the surface viscosity and the interior viscosity seem to decrease in a similar fashion when the shear rate exceeds approximately 0.05 s(-1). Unfortunately, even models with both surface viscosity and shear thinning studied are still not sufficient to fully explain all the features of neutrophil aspiration. In particular, the very high rate of aspiration during the initial moments after ramping of pressure remains mysterious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.