Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11720970›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2001

Discrimination of cardiac subcellular creatine kinase fluxes by NMR spectroscopy: a new method of analysis.

F Joubert, J A Hoerter, J L Mazet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F JoubertInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U-446, Cardiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Pharmacie, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France.
J A Hoerter
J L Mazet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A challenge in the understanding of creatine kinase (CK) fluxes reflected by NMR magnetization transfer in the perfused rat heart is the choice of a kinetic model of analysis. The complexity of the energetic pathways, due to the presence of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-inorganic phosphate (Pi) exchange, of metabolite compartmentation and of subcellular localization of CK isozymes cannot be resolve from the sole information obtained from a single NMR protocol. To analyze multicompartment exchanges, we propose a new strategy based on the simultaneous analysis of four inversion transfer protocols. The time course of ATP and Phosphocreatine (PCr) magnetizations computed from the McConnell equations were adjusted to their experimental value for exchange networks of increasing complexity (up to six metabolite pools). Exchange schemes were selected by the quality of their fit and their consistency with data from other sources: the size of mitochondrial pools and the ATP synthesis flux. The consideration of ATP-Pi exchange and of ATP compartmentation were insufficient to describe the data. The most appropriate exchange scheme in our normoxic heart involved the discrimination of three specific CK activities (cytosolic, mitochondrial, and close to ATPases). At the present level of heart contractility, the energy is transferred from mitochondria to myofibrils mainly by PCr.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAnimalsChi-Square DistributionCreatine KinaseEnergy TransferKineticsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleModels, BiologicalModels, ChemicalModels, StatisticalMyocardiumPerfusionRatsRats, WistarSoftwareAdenosine TriphosphateCreatine Kinase

Identifiers

PMID11720970
PMCPMC1301764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.