ReviewJournal of medical Internet research
Ethical challenges of medicine and health on the Internet: a review.
Review in Journal of medical Internet research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Ethical Analysis of the Online Content of Assisted Reproductive Technology Centers in Bangladesh.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
- ChatGPT and Corporations of Mega-journals Jeopardize the Norms That Underpin Academic Publishing.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Article
- Internet of Things and healthcare system: A systematic review of ethical issues.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Patient-Generated Health Photos and Videos Across Health and Well-being Contexts: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Investigating factors influencing patient trust in a developing Pacific Island Country, Fiji, 2018.Heliyon · 2020Article
- Ethical Issues of Social Media Usage in Healthcare.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2015Article
- eHealth, Participatory Medicine, and Ethical Care: A Focus Group Study of Patients' and Health Care Providers' Use of Health-Related Internet Information.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- The new health-related top-level domains are coming: will cureforcancer.health go to the highest bidder?Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Article
- Ethical principles for physician rating sites.Journal of medical Internet research · 2011Article
- The quality and characteristics of leading general hospitals' websites in China.Journal of medical systems · 2011Article
- A quality function deployment framework for the service quality of health information websites.Healthcare informatics research · 2010Article
- Cancer and the computerized family: towards a clinical ethics of "indirect" Internet use.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2008Article
- Do the leading children's hospitals have quality web sites? A description of children's hospital web sites.Journal of medical Internet research · 2004Article
- Health benefits and risks of the Internet.Journal of medical systems · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge and capabilities, particularly of a new technology or in a new area of study, frequently develop faster than the guidelines and principles needed for practitioners to practice ethically in the new arena; this is particularly true in medicine. The blending of medicine and healthcare with e-commerce and the Internet raises many questions involving what sort of ethical conduct should be expected by practitioners and developers of the medical Internet. Some of the early pioneers in medical and healthcare Web sites pushed the ethical boundaries with questionable, even unethical, practices. Many involved with the medical Internet are now working to reestablish patient and consumer trust by establishing guidelines to determine how the fundamentals of the medical code of ethical conduct can best be adapted for the medical/healthcare Internet. Ultimately, all those involved in the creation, maintenance, and marketing of medical and healthcare Web sites should be required to adhere to a strict code of ethical conduct, one that has been fairly determined by an impartial international organization with reasonable power to regulate the code. This code could also serve as a desirable, recognizable label-of-distinction for ethical Web sites within the medical and healthcare Internet community. One challenge for those involved with the medical and healthcare Internet will be to determine what constitutes "Medical Internet Ethics" or "Healthcare Internet Ethics," since the definition of medical ethics can vary from country to country. Therefore, the emerging field of Medical/ Healthcare Internet Ethics will require careful thought and insights from an international collection of ethicists in many contributing areas. This paper is a review of the current status of the evolving field of Medical/Healthcare Internet Ethics, including proposed definitions and identification of many diverse areas that may ultimately contribute to this multidisciplinary field. The current role that medicine and health play in the growing area of Internet communication and commerce and many of the ethical challenges raised by the Internet for the medical community are explored and some possible ways to address these ethical challenges are postulated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.