Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11720961›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research

Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age.

G Eysenbach, A R Jadad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. "Is Cybermedicine Killing You?"--The story of a Cochrane disaster.Journal of medical Internet research · 2005
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient participation in electronic nursing documentation: An interview study among home-care patients.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Examination of Health Information Needs of Caregivers of and Individuals with Burn Injuries.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Effectiveness of Using Personal Health Records to Improve Recommended Breast Cancer Screening and Reduce Racial and Geographic Disparities Among Women.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G EysenbachResearch Unit for Cybermedicine and eHealth Department of Clinical Social Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69115, Germany. ey@yi.com
A R Jadad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we explore current access to and barriers to health information for consumers. We discuss how computers and other developments in information technology are ushering in the era of consumer health informatics, and the potential that lies ahead. It is clear that we witness a period in which the public will have unprecedented ability to access information and to participate actively in evidence-based health care. We propose that consumer health informatics be regarded as a whole new academic discipline, one that should be devoted to the exploration of the new possibilities that informatics is creating for consumers in relation to health and health care issues.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorEvidence-Based MedicineInformation ServicesAccess to InformationData CollectionDecision MakingHumansInternetMedical InformaticsNursesPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID11720961
PMCPMC1761898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.