Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11720959›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research

Factors associated with intended use of a Web site among family practice patients.

P A Smith-Barbaro, J C Licciardone, H F Clarke, S T Coleridge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Examining health information-seeking behaviors of older adults.Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2013
    Article
  5. Addressing the changing sources of health information in iran.International journal of preventive medicine · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The WWW of the World Wide Web: Who, What, and Why?Journal of medical Internet research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P A Smith-BarbaroDepartment of Family Medicine, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA. pbarbaro@hsc.unt.edu
J C Licciardone
H F Clarke
S T Coleridge
Texas College · USUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Wide Web has become a widely utilized source of health information. Although the frequency of health related queries is impressive, the demographics associated with patients making queries has not been clearly delineated.

objectiveThis study s objective was to determine health related Internet usage patterns of family medicine patients.

methodsInternet use among 824 eligible patients 18 years or older attending seven university based family practice clinics during a two week period in November of 1999 was studied. The survey instrument included 10 items and was designed to collect data in less than five minutes using a paper and pencil format. Statistical significance associated with intended Web site use was computed using a multiple logistic regression model.

resultsA response rate of 72.2% was observed with 63.1% being females and 36.9% being males. The mean and median age were 44.0 and 45.7 years, respectively. A steady decline in intended Web site use was observed with advancing age with significant differences observed above 65 years (OR = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.14 - 0.64; p<.002). Other significant findings associated with intended use of a Web site by clinic based patients included having a home computer (OR = 1.99; 95%, CI = 1.05 3.76; p<0.03) and having Internet access at home (OR=5.6, 95%, CI = 2.83-11.18; p<.001). A lack of association between intended Web site use and health insurance status was observed.

conclusionsResults from this study suggest that Web sites are not likely to be alternative sources of health information for the uninsured or elderly in the near future.

Indexed as

PatientsAcademic Medical CentersAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFamily PracticeFemaleHealth EducationHumansInternetMaleMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedOutpatient Clinics, HospitalSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID11720959
PMCPMC1761902
OpenAlexW2070926634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.