ArticleJournal of medical Internet research
Quality management, certification and rating of health information on the Net with MedCERTAIN: using a medPICS/RDF/XML metadata structure for implementing eHealth ethics and creating trust globally.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Terminology and Definitions of Racial Health Equity in Prominent Health Websites: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Analysis of the quality of meningioma education resources available on the Internet.Neuro-oncology practice · 2021Article
- How to Fight an Infodemic: The Four Pillars of Infodemic Management.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Medical Content Searching, Retrieving, and Sharing Over the Internet: Lessons Learned From the mEducator Through a Scenario-Based Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- A call for a moratorium on the .health generic top-level domain: preventing the commercialization and exclusive control of online health information.Globalization and health · 2014Article
- Assessing the prognoses on Health care in the information society 2013--thirteen years after.Journal of medical systems · 2014Article
- The new health-related top-level domains are coming: will cureforcancer.health go to the highest bidder?Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Article
- Transparency of health-apps for trust and decision making.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013Article
- Review of extracting information from the Social Web for health personalization.Journal of medical Internet research · 2011Review
- Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology · 2006Article
- Internet infrastructures and health care systems: a qualitative comparative analysis on networks and markets in the British National Health Service and Kaiser Permanente.Journal of medical Internet research · 2002Review
- Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.JAMAArticle
- Promoting health literacy.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAReview
- Rating the raters: legal exposure of trustmark authorities in the context of consumer health informatics.Journal of medical Internet researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MedCERTAIN (MedPICS Certification and Rating of Trustworthy Health Information on the Net, http://www.medcertain.org/) is a recently launched international project funded under the European Union's (EU) "Action Plan for safer use of the Internet". It provides a technical infrastructure and a conceptual basis for an international system of "quality seals", ratings and self-labelling of Internet health information, with the final aim to establish a global "trustmark" for networked health information. Digital "quality seals" are evaluative metadata (using standards such as PICS=Platform for Internet Content Selection, now being replaced by RDF/XML) assigned by trusted third-party raters. The project also enables and encourages self-labelling with descriptive metainformation by web authors. Together these measures will help consumers as well as professionals to identify high-quality information on the Internet. MedCERTAIN establishes a fully functional demonstrator for a self- and third-party rating system enabling consumers and professionals to filter harmful health information and to positively identify and select high quality information. We aim to provide a trustmark system which allows citizens to place greater confidence in networked information, to encourage health information providers to follow best practices guidelines such as the Washington eHealth Code of Ethics, to provide effective feedback and law enforcement channels to handle user complaints, and to stimulate medical societies to develop standard for patient information. The project further proposes and identifies standards for interoperability of rating and description services (such as libraries or national health portals) and fosters a worldwide collaboration to guide consumers to high-quality information on the web.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11720933PMC1761877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.