ArticleJournal of medical Internet research
Challenges and changing roles for medical journals in the cyberspace age: electronic pre-prints and e-papers.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- "Is Cybermedicine Killing You?"--The story of a Cochrane disaster.Journal of medical Internet research · 2005Pooled it
- Using the Internet for surveys and health research.Journal of medical Internet researchPooled it
- Increasing utilization of Internet-based resources following efforts to promote evidence-based medicine: a national study in Taiwan.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Article
- Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness.Journal of medical Internet research · 2008Article
- The open access advantage.Journal of medical Internet research · 2006Article
- Citation advantage of open access articles.PLoS biology · 2006Article
- Peer review in a post-eprints world: a proposal.Journal of medical Internet researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.