ArticleBritish journal of cancer2001
Transduction of ovarian cancer cells: a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector compared to an adenoviral vector.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recombinant Viruses for Cancer Therapy.Biomedicines · 2018Review
- Carboxypeptidase-G2-based gene-directed enzyme-prodrug therapy: a new weapon in the GDEPT armoury.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2007Review
- AAV-encoded expression of TRAIL in experimental human colorectal cancer leads to tumor regression.Gene therapy · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors have emerged as vehicles for gene therapy. In addition, anti-neoplastic properties have been attributed to wild-type AAV. To take advantage of both features and to overcome technical problems associated with rAAV preparation, we developed a production method in which rAAV particles are amplified in an infectious cycle in the presence of wtAAV. This results in a 10(3)-10(4)-fold amplification of rAAV input particles. rAAV-GFP particles generated by this method were used to transduce ovarian cancer cell lines to evaluate their potential in ovarian cancer gene therapy, in comparison to a rAd-GFP vector. The transduction efficiency of NIH-OVCAR3, MDAH 2774 and SKOV3 cells with rAAV-GFP particles was low (< 1%) and did not improve by increasing the number of particles/cell. Repeated administration and continued exposure of NIH-OVCAR3 and MDAH 2774 improved transduction to over 3%. In contrast, these cell lines were more efficiently transduced by rAAV-GFP in the presence of adenovirus (approximately 15%) and by rAd-GFP (> 50%). These results indicate that in contrast to rAd vectors, rAAV particles are not suitable for therapeutic gene transfer in ovarian cancer cells unless efficient help can be provided to mediate ss to ds DNA conversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.