Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11720450›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2001

Transduction of ovarian cancer cells: a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector compared to an adenoviral vector.

J Vermeij, Z Zeinoun, B Neyns, E Teugels, C Bourgain, J De Grève

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J VermeijLaboratory of Medical and Molecular Oncology and Oncology Center, Akademisch Ziekenhuis Vrije Universiteit, Brussel, Belgium.
Z Zeinoun
B Neyns
E Teugels
C Bourgain
J De Grève
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors have emerged as vehicles for gene therapy. In addition, anti-neoplastic properties have been attributed to wild-type AAV. To take advantage of both features and to overcome technical problems associated with rAAV preparation, we developed a production method in which rAAV particles are amplified in an infectious cycle in the presence of wtAAV. This results in a 10(3)-10(4)-fold amplification of rAAV input particles. rAAV-GFP particles generated by this method were used to transduce ovarian cancer cell lines to evaluate their potential in ovarian cancer gene therapy, in comparison to a rAd-GFP vector. The transduction efficiency of NIH-OVCAR3, MDAH 2774 and SKOV3 cells with rAAV-GFP particles was low (< 1%) and did not improve by increasing the number of particles/cell. Repeated administration and continued exposure of NIH-OVCAR3 and MDAH 2774 improved transduction to over 3%. In contrast, these cell lines were more efficiently transduced by rAAV-GFP in the presence of adenovirus (approximately 15%) and by rAd-GFP (> 50%). These results indicate that in contrast to rAd vectors, rAAV particles are not suitable for therapeutic gene transfer in ovarian cancer cells unless efficient help can be provided to mediate ss to ds DNA conversion.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsAdenoviridaeCarcinomaDependovirusDNA, RecombinantDNA, ViralFemaleGenetic TherapyGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansImmunohistochemistryLuminescent ProteinsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesOvarian NeoplasmsTransduction, GeneticDNA, RecombinantDNA, ViralGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11720450
PMCPMC2363936
OpenAlexW1595098988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.