ArticleBrain research. Developmental brain research2001
Target specific differentiation of peripheral trigeminal axons in rat-chick chimeric explant cocultures.
Article in Brain research. Developmental brain research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular determinants of the face map development in the trigeminal brainstem.The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology · 2006Review
- Local neurotrophin effects on central trigeminal axon growth patterns.Brain research. Developmental brain research · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Avian and rodent trigeminal ganglion (TG) neurons share common features in their neurotrophin requirements and axonal projections between the sensory periphery and the brainstem. In rodents, the whisker pad (WP) is a major peripheral target of the infraorbital (IO) nerve component of the TG. The chick IO nerve is much smaller and innervates the maxillary process (MP). In the embryonic WP, IO axons course in fascicles from a caudal to rostral direction and form terminal plexuses around follicles. In the chick, IO axons travel as a thin bundle to the MP and branch out with no specific patterning. We cocultured E15 rat TG with E5-6 chick MP or chick TG with rat WP explants to examine target influences on trigeminal axon growth patterns as visualized with DiI labeling or neurofilament immunohistochemistry. Chick TG axons showed robust growth into WP explants, and the ganglion increased in size. Thick bundles of axons traveled between rows of follicles and formed a distinct pattern as they developed terminal arbors around individual follicles. In contrast, rat TG axon growth was sparse in chick MP explants and the ganglion size reduced over time. Furthermore, rat TG axons did not show any patterning in the chick MP. Similar target-specific growth patterns were observed when TG explants were given a choice between chick MP and rat WP explants. Collectively these results indicate that both the chick and rat TG cells respond to similar target-specific peripheral cues in the establishment of innervation density and patterning in peripheral orofacial targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.