Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11717405›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

Association between divergence and interspersed repeats in mammalian noncoding genomic DNA.

F Chiaromonte, S Yang, L Elnitski, V B Yap, W Miller, R C Hardison

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Organization of the MASP2 locus and its expression profile in mouse and rat.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2004
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F ChiaromonteDepartment of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
S Yang
L Elnitski
V B Yap
W Miller
R C Hardison

Funding

SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING BIOSEQUENCE DATAR01HG002238 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI MILLER, WEBB COLBY · 2000 to 2010
$7.8M
ORGANIZATION AND EXPRESSION OF GLOBIN GENE LOCIR01DK027635 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI HARDISON, ROSS C · 1986 to 2001
$472k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG02238NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002238NIDDK NIH HHS DK27635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amount of noncoding genomic DNA sequence that aligns between human and mouse varies substantially in different regions of their genomes, and the amount of repetitive DNA also varies. In this report, we show that divergence in noncoding nonrepetitive DNA is strongly correlated with the amount of repetitive DNA in a region. We investigated aligned DNA in four large genomic regions with finished human sequence and almost or completely finished mouse sequence. These regions, totaling 5.89 Mb of DNA, are on different chromosomes and vary in their base composition. An analysis based on sliding windows of 10 kb shows that the fraction of aligned noncoding nonrepetitive DNA and the fraction of repetitive DNA are negatively correlated, both at the level of an entire region and locally within it. This conclusion is strongly supported by a randomization study, in which repetitive elements are removed and randomly relocated along the sequences. Thus, regions of noncoding genomic DNA that accumulated fewer point mutations since the primate-rodent divergence also suffered fewer retrotransposition events. These results indicate that some regions of the genome are more "flexible" over the time scale of mammalian evolution, being able to accommodate many point mutations and insertions, whereas other regions are more "rigid" and accumulate fewer changes. Stronger conservation is generally interpreted as indicating more extensive or more important function. The evidence presented here of correlated variation in the rates of different evolutionary processes across noncoding DNA must be considered in assessing such conservation for evidence of selection.

Indexed as

GenomeInterspersed Repetitive SequencesAnimalsDNAEvolution, MolecularGenome, HumanHumansMiceRandom AllocationRetroelementsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNARetroelements

Identifiers

PMID11717405
PMCPMC64711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.