Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11713362›Full record

ReviewThorax2001

Animal models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

P A Dawkins, R A Stockley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thorax, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predicting the pulmonary effects of long-term e-cigarette use: are the clouds clearing?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  2. An immunometabolic pathomechanism for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  3. AAging · 2018
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Barriers to inhaled gene therapy of obstructive lung diseases: A review.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recent advances in pre-clinical mouse models of COPD.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P A DawkinsLung Investigation Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
R A Stockley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicRats

Identifiers

PMID11713362
PMCPMC1745992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.