ArticleNucleic acids research2001
Control of DNA excision efficiency in Paramecium.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Programmed excision of internal eliminated sequences (IESs) occurs at thousands of sites in ciliate genomes. How this is controlled is largely unknown. Here, we report the characterization of the non-efficiently excised 156psiG-11 IES from Paramecium primaurelia strain 156 and that of the efficiently excised 168psiG-11 IES, an allelic variant from strain 168. Then, we report a genetic and molecular analysis of IES excision efficiency in F(1) progeny derived from interstrain crosses and in F(2) homozygous progeny derived from F(1) autogamy. IES 168psiG-11 excision efficiency was approximately 100% in all cases. IES 156psiG-11 excision efficiency was 19 +/- 13% in F(1) progeny and 0.6 +/- 1.1% in F(2) progeny. No trans-excision event between IESs 156psiG-11 and 168psiG-11 was detected within the F(1) progeny. These data demonstrate that the excision efficiency of this IES is variable and controlled by a cis-acting element. This should encompass positions 8 and/or 9 of the right IES end, which display allele differences. Finally, the 30-fold stimulation of IES 156psiG-11 excision efficiency within F(1) progeny relative to F(2) progeny demonstrates that Paramecium IES excision efficiency is sensitive either to a conjugation-specific trans-acting factor provided by the zygotic genome, or to homologous chromosome cross-talk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.