Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11713314›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2001

Prediction of DNA single-strand conformation polymorphism: analysis by capillary electrophoresis and computerized DNA modeling.

D H Atha, W Kasprzak, C D O'Connell, B A Shapiro

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D H AthaBiotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA. donald.atha@nist.gov
W Kasprzak
C D O'Connell
B A Shapiro
National Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

OPERATIONS &TECHNICAL SUPPORTN01CO056000 · CO · SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP · PI FISCHINGER, PETER J · 1995 to 2000
$95.0M
NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-56000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have analyzed previously three representative p53 single-point mutations by capillary-electrophoresis single-strand conformation polymorphism (CE-SSCP). In the current study, we compared our CE-SSCP results with the potential secondary structures predicted by an RNA/DNA-folding algorithm with DNA energy rules, used in conjunction with a computer analysis workbench called STRUCTURELAB. Each of these mutations produces measurable shifts in CE migration times relative to wild type. Using computerized folding analysis, each of the mutations was found to have a conformational difference relative to wild type, which accounts for the observed differences in CE migration. Additional properties exhibited in the CE electropherograms were also explained using the computerized analysis. These include the appearance of secondary peaks and the temperature dependence of the electrophoretic patterns. The results yield insight into the mechanism of SSCP and how the conditions of this measurement, especially temperature, may be optimized to improve the sensitivity of the SSCP method. The results may also impact other diagnostic methods, which would benefit by a better understanding of DNA single-strand conformation polymorphisms to optimize conditions for enzymatic cleavage and DNA hybridization reactions.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single-Stranded ConformationalBase SequenceComputational BiologyComputing MethodologiesDNADNA Mutational AnalysisElectrophoresis, CapillaryExonsHumansMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationPoint MutationPolymerase Chain ReactionTemperatureTumor Cells, CulturedTumor Suppressor Protein p53DNATumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID11713314
PMCPMC92558
OpenAlexW2097687472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.