ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001
Participation of patients in decisions about treatment for cancer.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Effects of using online narrative and didactic information on healthcare participation for breast cancer patients.Patient education and counseling · 2008Trial
- Observational
- Exploring Health Information-Seeking Preferences of Older Adults With Hypertension: Quasi-Experimental Design.JMIR cardio · 2018Article
- Desire for Information in the Elderly: Interactions with Patients, Family, and Physicians.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015Article
- Longitudinal qualitative exploration of cancer information-seeking experiences across the disease trajectory: the INFO-SEEK protocol.BMJ open · 2015Article
- Prescription medicines: decision-making preferences of patients who receive different levels of public subsidy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014Article
- Dying cancer patients talk about physician and patient roles in DNR decision making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011Article
- Attitudes towards palliative care in primary metastatic cancer: a survey among oncologists.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2010Article
- What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: qualitative study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008Article
- Article
- Antecedent characteristics of online cancer information seeking among rural breast cancer patients: an application of the Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing (C-SHIP) model.Journal of health communication · 2008Article
- The UK Expert Patients Program: lessons learned and implications for cancer survivors' self-care support programs.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2008Article
- Consumer information materials for diagnostic breast tests: women's views on information and their understanding of test results.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2003Article
- Clients or citizens? Some considerations for primary care organisations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003Article
- Keeping the Person in Personalised Healthcare.Biomedicine hubReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.