ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2001
Picking out parallels: plant circadian clocks in context.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibitor treatment and subcellular localization analysis reveal the contribution of a cytosolic terpene synthase to the substantial release of anti-insect monoterpenes by Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) Pruski.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Changes in Gene Expression During Flowering Induction in Sugarcane Under Controlled Photoperiodic Conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Precise Editing of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Construction of recombinant pEGFP-N1-hPer2 plasmid and its expression in osteosarcoma cells.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- The circadian clock goes genomic.Genome biology · 2013Review
- Mathematical modeling of an oscillating gene circuit to unravel the circadian clock network of Arabidopsis thaliana.Frontiers in plant science · 2013Article
- Computational identification of protein-protein interactions in rice based on the predicted rice interactome network.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Cloning and functional characterization of a beta-pinene synthase from Artemisia annua that shows a circadian pattern of expression.Plant physiology · 2002Article
- Cellular signalling and the complexity of biological timing: insights from the ultradian clock of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2001Review
- RNA-binding proteins and circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis thaliana.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular models have been described for the circadian clocks of representatives of several different taxa. Much of the work on the plant circadian system has been carried out using the thale cress, Arabidopsis thaliana, as a model. We discuss the roles of genes implicated in the plant circadian system, with special emphasis on Arabidopsis. Plants have an endogenous clock that regulates many aspects of circadian and photoperiodic behaviour. Despite the discovery of components that resemble those involved in the clocks of animals or fungi, no coherent model of the plant clock has yet been proposed. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of studies of the Arabidopsis circadian system. We shall compare these with results from different taxa and discuss them in the context of what is known about clocks in other organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.