ArticleBritish journal of cancer2001
Differential p53 protein expression in breast cancer fine needle aspirates: the potential for in vivo monitoring.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is the least invasive method of sampling breast cancer in vivo and provides material for breast cancer diagnosis. FNA has also been used to examine cellular markers to predict and monitor the effects of therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of using FNA material compared with resected cancer for Western blotting studies of the p53 pathway, a key to tumour response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Paired samples of breast cancer FNAs collected pre-operatively and post-operatively were compared with tissue samples obtained at the time of surgical resection. Western blots were probed for p53 using the antibodies DO12 and DO1, and for levels of downstream proteins p21/WAF1 and p27. The protein extracted by FNA was sufficient for up to 5 Western blot studies. p53 expression and phosphorylation did not differ significantly pre- and post-operatively, indicating that intra-operative manipulation does not affect p53 expression or downstream activation in breast cancer. However, expression of p53, p21 and p27 varied between individual patients suggesting a range of p53 pathway activation in breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that the cancer cells accounted for the protein expression detected on Western blots. FNA yields adequate protein for Western blotting studies and could be used as a method to monitor p53 activity in vivo before and during anti-cancer treatment possibly providing early evidence of tumour response to therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.