Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11708763›Full record

ReviewDrugs2001

Pregnancy and renal failure: the case for application of dosage guidelines.

F Keller, M Griesshammer, U Häussler, W Paulus, A Schwarz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Changes to methadone clearance during pregnancy.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F KellerDivision of Nephrology, Medical Faculty, University of Ulm, Germany. frieder.keller@medizin.uni-ulm.de
M Griesshammer
U Häussler
W Paulus
A Schwarz
Universität Ulm · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancies in women with renal disease, undergoing dialysis treatment or with kidney transplants are increasingly observed. Serious problems with drug dose adjustment may arise in pregnant women with renal impairment. This review gives a practical overview on the risks of drug use during gestation, the recommended drugs of choice (e.g. methyldopa, cyclosporin), and provides some proposals for dosage adjustments in pregnant women with renal impairment. In normal pregnancy, the glomerular filtration rate and plasma volume increase, whereas plasma protein binding and liver function may be impaired. An increase in dosage is needed for cyclosporin and for methadone because of increased hepatic clearance. The dosage of erythropoetin must be increased because of lower potency in pregnant women. Little more is known on the impact of gestation on drug dose, since pharmacokinetic studies are rarely done in pregnant women. The dosages of magnesium, lithium and morphine must be reduced in renal impairment. Dose adjustment to renal function is critical and is essential for anti-infective agents (e.g. ceftazidime, ganciclovir). Basing drug dose on estimated creatinine clearance might be the most practical solution in pregnant women with renal impairment.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationPharmaceutical PreparationsPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRenal DialysisPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID11708763
OpenAlexW2227626784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.