ArticleCirculation2001
Abnormal epicardial coronary resistance in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis but "Normal" coronary angiography.
Article in Circulation, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05392959 (Effect of the Antidiabetic Drug DAPAgliflozin on the Coronary Macrovascular and MICROvascular Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 151 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of the Antidiabetic Drug DAPAgliflozin on the Coronary Macrovascular and MICROvascular Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Who cites it
151 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 489 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of optical flow ratio: an individual patient-data meta-analysis.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Vasodilator Myocardial Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Superior to Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in the Detection of Relevant Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Their Diagnostic Accuracy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2017Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in ischemia-causing coronary stenosis: a meta-analysis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2016Pooled it
- Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Utility ofCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Trial
- Coronary artery height differences and their effect on fractional flow reserve.Cardiology journal · 2021Trial
- Global Fractional Flow Reserve Value Predicts 5-Year Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Atherosclerosis But Without Ischemia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Trial
- The Prognostic Significance of Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach Using Perfusion Mapping.Circulation · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Prognostic value of troponin I levels for predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes in postmenopausal women undergoing cardiac surgery.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2009Trial
- Effects of atorvastatin on coronary flow reserve in patients with slow coronary flow.Clinical cardiology · 2007Trial
- Low-dose adenosine stress echocardiography: detection of myocardial viability.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2003Trial
- Prevalence of impaired flow-mediated epicardial vasodilation among different types of coronary flow regulation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Feasibility of On-Site CT-FFR Analysis in Ruling Out In-Stent Restenosis on Cardiac PCCT.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-guided quantitative coronary CT assessment to rule-in or rule-out myocardial ischaemia.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2026Article
- Aortic pressure-velocity loop: a potential tool for assessing risk associated with midsystolic forward compression waves in patients with chronic atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Coronary CT angiography-derived epicardial coronary volume to left ventricular mass ratio associated with myocardial ischemic events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Myocardial compression and recoil as determinants of coronary blood flow.European heart journal · 2025Review
91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary arteries without focal stenosis at angiography are generally considered non-flow-limiting. However, atherosclerosis is a diffuse process that often remains invisible at angiography. Accordingly, we hypothesized that in patients with coronary artery disease, nonstenotic coronary arteries induce a decrease in pressure along their length due to diffuse coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS AND
resultsCoronary pressure and fractional flow reserve (FFR), as indices of coronary conductance, were obtained from 37 arteries in 10 individuals without atherosclerosis (group I) and from 106 nonstenotic arteries in 62 patients with arteriographic stenoses in another coronary artery (group II). In group I, the pressure gradient between aorta and distal coronary artery was minimal at rest (1+/-1 mm Hg) and during maximal hyperemia (3+/-3 mm Hg). Corresponding values were significantly larger in group II (5+/-4 mm Hg and 10+/-8 mm Hg, respectively; both P<0.001). The FFR was near unity (0.97+/-0.02; range, 0.92 to 1) in group I, indicating no resistance to flow in truly normal coronary arteries, but it was significantly lower (0.89+/-0.08; range, 0.69 to 1) in group II, indicating a higher resistance to flow. In 57% of arteries in group II, FFR was lower than the lowest value in group I. In 8% of arteries in group II, FFR was <0.75, the threshold for inducible ischemia.
conclusionDiffuse coronary atherosclerosis without focal stenosis at angiography causes a graded, continuous pressure fall along arterial length. This resistance to flow contributes to myocardial ischemia and has consequences for decision-making during percutaneous coronary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.