ReviewQuality in health care : QHC2001
Working and learning together: good quality care depends on it, but how can we achieve it?
Review in Quality in health care : QHC, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nexus of Quality Use of Medicines, Pharmacists' Activities, and the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Perceptions of Hand Surgery Patients About Occupational Therapy.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024Article
- What is complexity of hospital-based physiotherapy from the perspective of physiotherapists themselves? A grounded theory study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Totally Excited about Moving Mobility and Exercise (TEAM MChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Perception of Allied Health Professionals on Occupational Therapy.Occupational therapy international · 2022Article
- Coproduction in the management of individuals with cleft lip and palate in South Africa: the Ekhaya Lethu model.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021Article
- A qualitative approach to identify barriers to multi-professional teamwork among medical professors at Iranian teaching hospitals.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Interprofessional collaboration and barriers among health and social workers caring for older adults: a Philippine case study.Human resources for health · 2021Article
- Interprofessional collaboration among health professionals in cleft lip and palate treatment and care in the public health sector of South Africa.Human resources for health · 2021Article
- Simulation educators in clinical work: the manager's perspective.Journal of health organization and management · 2020Article
- How to get started in quality improvement.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Article
- Closing the Gap: Experienced Simulation Educators' Role and Impact on Everyday Health care.The Journal of continuing education in the health professions · 2019Article
- Interprofessional Competency Frameworks in Education.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2019Article
- 12 tips for developing inter-professional education (IPE) in healthcare.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2019Article
- Physicians' perspectives on clinical pharmacy services in Northern Sweden: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Developing an Adapted Cardiac Rehabilitation Training for Home Care Clinicians: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES, CLINICIAN KNOWLEDGE, AND CURRICULUM OVERVIEW.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2017Article
- Research involvement among undergraduate health sciences students: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2017Article
- Doctors' and nurses' perceptions of a ward-based pharmacist in rural northern Sweden.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Article
- Acceptance and attitudes of healthcare staff towards the introduction of clinical pharmacy service: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Perceived needs of pharmaceutical care services among healthcare professionals in South Korea: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Educating healthcare professionals is a key issue in the provision of quality healthcare services, and interprofessional education (IPE) has been proposed as a means of meeting this challenge. Evidence that collaborative working can be essential for good clinical outcomes underpins the real need to find out how best to develop a work force that can work together effectively. We identify barriers to mounting successful IPE programmes, report on recent educational initiatives that have aimed to develop collaborative working, and discuss the lessons learned. To develop education strategies that really prepare learners to collaborate we must: agree on the goals of IPE, identify effective methods of delivery, establish what should be learned when, attend to the needs of educators and clinicians regarding their own competence in interprofessional work, and advance our knowledge by robust evaluation using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. We must ensure that our education strategies allow students to recognise, value, and engage with the difference arising from the practice of a range of health professionals. This means tackling some long held assumptions about education and identifying where it fosters norms and attitudes that interfere with collaboration or fails to engender interprofessional knowledge and skill. We need to work together to establish education strategies that enhance collaborative working along with profession specific skills to produce a highly skilled, proactive, and respectful work force focused on providing safe and effective health for patients and communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.