Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11696446›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2001

Immunophenotypic analysis of the TCR-Vbeta repertoire in 98 persistent expansions of CD3(+)/TCR-alphabeta(+) large granular lymphocytes: utility in assessing clonality and insights into the pathogenesis of the disease.

M Lima, J Almeida, A H Santos, M dos Anjos Teixeira, M C Alguero, M L Queirós, A Balanzategui, B Justiça, M Gonzalez, J F San Miguel and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cancers · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M LimaServiço de Hematologia Clínica, Unidade de Citometria, Hospital Geral de Santo António, Porto, Portugal. mmc.lima@clix.pt
J Almeida
A H Santos
M dos Anjos Teixeira
M C Alguero
M L Queirós
A Balanzategui
B Justiça
M Gonzalez
J F San Miguel
A Orfão
Hospital de Santo António · PTUniversidad de Salamanca · ESCentro de Investigación del Cáncer · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, a major challenge in the initial diagnosis of leukemia of large granular lymphocytes (LGLs) is to establish the clonal nature of the expanded population. In the present study we have analyzed by flow cytometry immunophenotyping the TCR-Vbeta repertoire of 98 consecutive cases of persistent expansions of CD4(+) or CD8(+bright) CD3(+)/TCR-alphabeta(+) LGLs and compared the results with those obtained in molecular studies of TCR-beta gene rearrangements. Fifty-eight cases were considered to be monoclonal in molecular studies whereas in the remaining 40 cases there was no evidence for monoclonality (11 cases were considered oligoclonal and 29 polyclonal). The TCR-Vbeta repertoire was biased to the preferential use of one or more TCR-Vbeta families in 96% of cases, a total of 124 TCR-Vbeta expansions being diagnosed: one TCR-Vbeta expansion in 71 cases and two or more TCR-Vbeta expansions in 23 cases. The highest TCR-Vbeta expansion observed in each case was higher among monoclonal (74 +/- 19%) as compared to nonmonoclonal cases (24 +/- 14%) (P = 0.001), as did the fraction of LGLs that exhibited a TCR-Vbeta-restricted pattern (86 +/- 16% and 42 +/- 23%, respectively; P = 0.0001); by contrast, the proportion of cases displaying more than one TCR-Vbeta expansion was higher in the latter group: 7% versus 48%, respectively (P = 0.001). Results obtained in oligoclonal cases were intermediate between those obtained in polyclonal and monoclonal cases and similar results were observed for CD4(+) as for CD8(+bright) T-cell expansions. TCR-Vbeta families expressed in CD8(+bright) T-cell-LGL proliferations showed a pattern of distribution that mimics the frequency at which the individual TCR-Vbeta families are represented in normal peripheral blood T cells. Assuming that a given proliferation of LGLs is monoclonal whenever there is an expansion of a given TCR-Vbeta family of at least 40% of the total CD4(+) or CD8(+bright) T-cell compartment, we were able to predict clonality with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 80%. By increasing the cut-off value to 60%, sensitivity and specificity were of 81% and 100%. In summary, our results suggest that flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis of the TCR-Vbeta repertoire is a powerful screening tool for the assessment of T-cell clonality in persistent expansions of TCR-alphabeta(+) LGLs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCD3 ComplexCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChildClone CellsFemaleHumansImmunophenotypingLeukemia, ExperimentalMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaCD3 ComplexReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta

Identifiers

PMID11696446
PMCPMC1867049
OpenAlexW2127751922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.