Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11693299›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2001

Early nephron formation in the developing mouse kidney.

J B Bard, A Gordon, L Sharp, W I Sellers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recapitulating kidney development: Progress and challenges.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Functional Human Podocytes Generated in Organoids from Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Coordination of kidney organogenesis by Wnt signaling.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. In vivo maturation of functional renal organoids formed from embryonic cell suspensions.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2012
    Article
  10. Wound healing in development.Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J B BardDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK. j.bard@ed.ac.uk
A Gordon
L Sharp
W I Sellers
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports 3-dimensional confocal microscopy observations on how nephrogenic aggregates form from the NCAM- and Pax2-positive caps (4-5 cells deep) of condensed metanephric mesenchyme surrounding the duct tips of the mouse kidney. Aggregates of 6-8 cells are first seen at approximately E12.5-12.75 immediately proximal to this cap, closely abutting the duct surface. As the tip advances, NCAM expression is maintained in the cap but is otherwise restricted to aggregates whose cells rapidly epithelialise, forming tubules that invade the duct epithelium. Pax2 expression studies shows how the rind of nephrogenic blastemal cells forms: as duct tips extend towards the kidney surface, the associated Pax2+ cells form patches of cells on the kidney surface. These observations revise our knowledge of the timing and process of nephron initiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionEmbryonic InductionImmunohistochemistryMiceMice, Inbred CBAMicroscopy, ConfocalNephronsNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesUreterNeural Cell Adhesion Molecules

Identifiers

PMID11693299
PMCPMC1468349
OpenAlexW2150699722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.