Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11691763›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001

Antibacterial prescribing and antibacterial resistance in English general practice: cross sectional study.

P Priest, P Yudkin, C McNulty, D Mant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical predictors of antibiotic prescribing for acutely ill children in primary care: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Relative impact of clinical evidence and over-the-counter prescribing on topical antibiotic use for acute infective conjunctivitis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Multicentre study of antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic consumption among 6,780 patients with bloodstream infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P PriestUniversity of Oxford, Department of Primary Health Care. patricia.priest@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
P Yudkin
C McNulty
D Mant

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantify the relation between community based antibacterial prescribing and antibacterial resistance in community acquired disease.

designCross sectional study of antibacterial prescribing and antibacterial resistance of routine isolates within individual practices and primary care groups.

setting405 general practices (38 groups) in south west and north west England.

main outcome measuresCorrelation between antibacterial prescribing and resistance for urinary coliforms and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

resultsAntibacterial resistance in urinary coliform isolates is common but the correlation with prescribing rates was relatively low for individual practices (ampicillin and amoxicillin r(s)=0.20, P=0.001; trimethoprim r(s)=0.24, P=0.0001) and primary care groups (ampicillin and amoxicillin r(s)=0.44, P=0.05; trimethoprim r(s)=0.31, P=0.09). Regression coefficients were also low; a practice prescribing 20% less ampicillin and amoxicillin than average would have about 1% fewer resistant isolates (0.94/100; 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 1.85). Resistance of S pneumoniae to both penicillin and erythromycin remains uncommon, and no clear relation with prescribing was found.

conclusionsRoutine microbiological isolates should not be used for surveillance of antibacterial resistance in the community or for monitoring the outcome of any change in antibacterial prescribing by general practitioners. Trying to reduce the overall level of antibiotic prescribing in UK general practice may not be the most effective strategy for reducing resistance in the community.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleDrug UtilizationEnglandEnterobacteriaceaeFamily PracticeHumansPenicillin ResistancePractice Patterns, Physicians'Streptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID11691763
PMCPMC59384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.