Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11690545›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2001

A simple method for statistical analysis of intensity differences in microarray-derived gene expression data.

A Kamb, M Ramaswami

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Variance estimation in the analysis of microarray data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2009
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A KambArcaris, Inc (Currently Deltagen Proteomics, Inc) Salt Lake City, UT, USA. kamb@arcaris.com
M Ramaswami

Funding

GENES INVOLVED IN LONG TERM NEURAL PLASTICITYR01DA013337 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI VETTER, MONICA L · 1999 to 2001
$817k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R01 DA 13337-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroarray experiments offer a potent solution to the problem of making and comparing large numbers of gene expression measurements either in different cell types or in the same cell type under different conditions. Inferences about the biological relevance of observed changes in expression depend on the statistical significance of the changes. In lieu of many replicates with which to determine accurate intensity means and variances, reliable estimates of statistical significance remain problematic. Without such estimates, overly conservative choices for significance must be enforced.

resultsA simple statistical method for estimating variances from microarray control data which does not require multiple replicates is presented. Comparison of datasets from two commercial entities using this difference-averaging method demonstrates that the standard deviation of the signal scales at a level intermediate between the signal intensity and its square root. Application of the method to a dataset related to the beta-catenin pathway yields a larger number of biologically reasonable genes whose expression is altered than the ratio method.

conclusionsThe difference-averaging method enables determination of variances as a function of signal intensities by averaging over the entire dataset. The method also provides a platform-independent view of important statistical properties of microarray data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsbeta CateninCell LineCytoskeletal ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsRNA, MessengerStatistics as TopicTrans-Activatorsbeta CateninCTNNB1 protein, humanCytoskeletal ProteinsRNA, MessengerTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID11690545
PMCPMC59472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.