Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11687596›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2001

Evaluation of T cell receptor testing in lymphoid neoplasms: results of a multicenter study of 29 extracted DNA and paraffin-embedded samples.

D A Arber, R M Braziel, A Bagg, K E Bijwaard

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hepatosplenic gammadelta T-cell lymphoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2005
    Article
  11. Molecular diagnosis in lymphoma.Current oncology reports · 2004
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma.Current oncology reports · 2002
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D A ArberDivision of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA. darber@coh.org
R M Braziel
A Bagg
K E Bijwaard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate current diagnostic methods used for the evaluation of T cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements, 24 different laboratories analyzed 29 lymphoid neoplasm samples of extracted DNA and paraffin-embedded tissue and were asked to complete a technical questionnaire related to the testing. Participating laboratories performed Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for rearrangements of the TCRbeta chain gene and PCR for the TCRgamma chain gene rearrangements. Of 14 laboratories performing TCRbeta Southern blot analysis, there was complete agreement in 10 of 14 cases, with some false negative results obtained in 4 cases. No false positive results were obtained by Southern blot analysis. TCRbeta PCR analysis was only performed by two laboratories, and only 47.1% of positive samples were detected. Twenty-one laboratory results were obtained for TCRgamma PCR. This method showed an overall detection rate of 77.9% for T cell gene rearrangements with a 4.1% false positive rate, as compared to both TCRgamma Southern blot analysis results and immunophenotyping. The detection rate for TCRgamma PCR, however, significantly differed when extracted DNA samples from frozen tissue were compared to paraffin-embedded tissue (85.4% versus 65.9%; P = 0.0005). Significant differences in true positive results were obtained when laboratories using primers directed against multiple TCRgamma variable regions (V1-8 plus one to three other primer sets) were compared to laboratories that used only a single set of TCR primers directed against the V1-8 (P < 0.0001). Other technical factors significantly affecting results were also identified. These findings provide useful data on the current state of diagnostic TCR testing, highlight the risk of false negative results for TCR testing directed against only portions of the TCRgamma gene, and identify limitations of testing of paraffin-embedded tissues in some laboratories.

Indexed as

Blotting, SouthernClone CellsFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFrozen SectionsGene Rearrangement, gamma-Chain T-Cell Antigen ReceptorGenes, T-Cell Receptor gammaHumansImmunophenotypingLaboratoriesLeukemiaLymphomaObserver VariationParaffin EmbeddingPolymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID11687596
PMCPMC1906960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.