SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Treatment for amphetamine psychosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association between the SLC6A3 VNTR 9-repeat allele and alcoholism-a meta-analysis.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2011Pooled it
- Treatment for amphetamine psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Retrospective analysis of 217 fatal intoxication autopsy cases from 2009 to 2021: temporal trends in fatal intoxication at Tongji center for medicolegal expertise, Hubei, China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Risk of psychosis in illicit amphetamine users: a 10 year retrospective cohort study.Evidence-based mental health · 2022Article
- Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Treatment With Haloperidol and Risperidone: A Pilot Study.Iranian journal of psychiatry and behavioral sciences · 2016Article
- Methamphetamine/amphetamine abuse and risk of Parkinson's disease in Utah: a population-based assessment.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2015Article
- Animal Models of Psychosis: Current State and Future Directions.Current behavioral neuroscience reports · 2014Article
- Combined bias suppression in single-arm therapy studies.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2008Article
- Assessing the order of magnitude of outcomes in single-arm cohorts through systematic comparison with corresponding cohorts: an example from the AMOS study.BMC medical research methodology · 2008Review
- Co-occurring Hepatitis C, substance use, and psychiatric illness: treatment issues and developing integrated models of care.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2004Article
- Psychiatric side effects of medications prescribed in internal medicine.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the phase of chronic, high-dose consumption of amphetamines, many amphetamine users may have the experience of paranoia and hallucination. It has long been believed that dopamine antagonists, such as chlorpromazine, haloperidol, and thioridazine, are effective for the treatment of amphetamine psychosis.
objectivesTo search and determine risks, benefits, and costs of a variety treatments for amphetamine psychosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of MEDLINE (1966-2000), EMBASE (1980-2000), CINAHL (1982- January 2001) and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library 2000 issue 4) were undertaken. References to the articles obtained by any means were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical trials (CCTs) were included. Participants were people with amphetamine psychosis, diagnosed by any set of criteria. Any kinds of biological and psychological treatments both alone and combined were examined. A variety of outcomes, for example, number of treatment responders, score changes, were considered. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers evaluated and extracted the data independently. The dichotomous data were extracted on an intention-to-treat basis in which the dropouts were assigned as participants with the worst outcomes. The Relative Risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to assess the dichotomous data. The Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) with 95% CI was used to assess the continuous data. MAIN
resultsThe comprehensive searches found no controlled trials of treatment for amphetamine psychosis meeting the criteria for considering studies. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe evidence about the treatment for amphetamine psychosis is very limited. To our knowledge, no controlled trials of treatment for amphetamine psychosis have been carried out. The results of two studies in amphetamine users show that agitation and some psychotic symptoms may be abated within an hour after antipsychotic injection. Whether this limited evidence can be applied for amphetamine psychotic patients is not yet known. The risks and benefits of giving an antipsychotic injection should be further investigated in amphetamine psychotic patients. Medications that have been used for the treatment of acute exacerbation of schizophrenia should be studied in amphetamine psychotic patients. The medications that may be of interest are conventional antipsychotics, newer antipsychotics and benzodiazepines. However, naturalistic studies of amphetamine psychotic symptoms and course are also crucial for the development of study designs appropriate for further treatment studies of amphetamine psychosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.