SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic reviews as a 'lens of evidence': Determinants of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening.International journal of cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Screening for breast cancer with mammography.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Pooled it
- Personalised informed choice on evidence and controversy on mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC cancer · 2017Trial
- [Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].Der Radiologe · 2005Trial
- Survival Benefits and Less Intensive Treatment for Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosed While Participating in Population-Based Screening.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Multi-Class Classification of Breast Cancer Subtypes Using ResNet Architectures on Histopathological Images.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Breast cancer awareness, knowledge and self-screening intention among females in Northern Border of Saudi Arabia, Arar City.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Prevalence of breast cancer in rural population of Jaipur: a survey-based observational study.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Article
- Exploring the Radioprotective Indium (III) Oxide Screens for Mammography Scans Using a Three-Layer Heterogeneous Breast Phantom and MCNPX: A Comparative Study Using Clinical Findings.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- A plea for more careful scholarship in reviewing evidence: the case of mammographic screening.BJR open · 2023Review
- Misinformation and Facts about Breast Cancer Screening.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Mean Glandular Dose between Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Pharmaceutical Technology Approach on Imaging Innovations from Italian Research.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- The Function and Mechanism of Lipid Molecules and Their Roles in The Diagnosis and Prognosis of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Breast Cancer Screening Program in Lithuania: Trends in Breast Cancer Mortality Before and During the Introduction of the Mammography Screening Program.Acta medica Lituanic · 2020Article
- Correlation analysis between ultrasonography and mammography with other risk factors related to breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Innovative Diagnostic Methods for Early Prostate Cancer Detection through Urine Analysis: A Review.Cancers · 2018Review
- Breast DCE-MRI: lesion classification using dynamic and morphological features by means of a multiple classifier system.European radiology experimental · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMammographic screening for breast cancer is controversial, as reflected in greatly varying national policies.
objectivesTo assess the effect of screening for breast cancer with mammography on mortality and morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE (16 May 2000), The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's trial register (24 Jan 2000) and reference lists. Letters, abstracts and unpublished trials. Authors were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing mammographic screening with no mammographic screening. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by both authors independently. MAIN
resultsSeven completed and eligible trials involving half a million women were identified. The two best trials provided medium-quality data and, when combined, yield a relative risk for overall mortality of 1.00 (95% CI 0.96-1.05) after 13 years. However, the trials are underpowered for all-cause mortality, and confidence intervals include a possible worthwhile effect as well as a possible detrimental effect. If data from all eligible trials (excluding flawed studies) are considered then the relative risk for overall mortality after 13 years is 1.01 (95% CI 0.99-1.03). The best trials failed to show a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality with a relative risk of 0.97 (95% CI 0.82-1.14). If data from all eligible trials (excluding flawed studies) are considered then the relative risk for breast cancer mortality after 13 years is 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.89). However, breast cancer mortality is considered to be an unreliable outcome and biased in favour of screening. Flaws are due to differential exclusion of women with breast cancer from analysis and differential misclassification of cause of death. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe currently available reliable evidence does not show a survival benefit of mass screening for breast cancer (and the evidence is inconclusive for breast cancer mortality). Women, clinicians and policy makers should consider these findings carefully when they decide whether or not to attend or support screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.