Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11687080›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001

Dietary salt reduction or exclusion for allergic asthma.

K D Ardern, F S Ram

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dietary sodium manipulation and asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dietary factors and the development of asthma.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2008
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Mild dehydration: a risk factor of broncho-pulmonary disorders?European journal of clinical nutrition · 2003
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K D ArdernDepartment of Public Health, Liverpool Health Authority, Hamilton House, Pall Mall, Liverpool, UK, L3 6AL. kate.ardern@liverpool-ha.nhs.uk
F S Ram

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a wide geographical variation in asthma prevalence and one explanation may be in dietary salt consumption.

objectivesTo assess the effect of dietary sodium reduction in patients with asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was conducted using the Cochrane Airways Group asthma register. Bibliographies of included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were searched for additional studies. Authors of identified RCTs were contacted for other studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All studies were to be RCTs that involved dietary salt reduction or increased salt intake in patients with asthma. Studies of other allergic conditions such as hay fever, allergic rhinitis and eczema were considered patients with asthma were separately identified. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study quality was assessed and data extracted by two reviewers. All data analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration software (RevMan 4.1.1). MAIN

resultsFifty-six abstracts were identified and 15 studies were reviewed in full text. Five fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Nine were excluded. One was published in duplicate. Complete agreement was reached between the reviewers on inclusion or exclusion of all studies. All studies were small and of short duration. Data from only three could be pooled. Low sodium diet was associated with a significantly lower urine sodium excretion than normal or high salt diets. There were no significant differences in any asthma outcome between low salt and normal or high salt diets, but FEV1 was slightly higher with low salt compared to normal, WMD 0.09 L (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.26, 0.44 L, n=88), as was daily PEFR, WMD 11 l/min (95% CI -81, 103 l/min, n=78). With low compared to high salt, FEV1 was slightly higher WMD 0.22 L (95% CI -0.14, 0.59 L, n=88), as was daily PEFR, WMD 14 l/min (95% CI -41, 68 l/min, n=78). Bronchodilator use was slightly lower, WMD 0.7 puffs/day (95% CI -1.8, 0.5 puffs/day, n=62). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsBased on currently available evidence it is not possible to conclude whether dietary salt reduction has any place in the treatment or management of asthma.

Indexed as

AsthmaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSodium Chloride, DietarySodium Chloride, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID11687080
OpenAlexW4250543465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.