SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Doxapram treatment for apnea in preterm infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Doxapram treatment for apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation. Doxapram has been used to stimulate breathing and so prevent apnea and its consequences.
objectivesIn preterm infants with recurrent apnea, does treatment with doxapram lead to a clinically important reduction in apnea and use of intermittent positive airways pressure (IPPV), without clinically important side effects? SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal trials, the Cochrane Collaboration Clinical Trials Register, MEDLINE 1966 - July 2001, Embase 1980 - July 2001, CINAHL 1982 - July 2001 (using text words 'doxapram', 'apnea or apnoea' and MeSH term 'infant, premature'), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, mainly in the English language. Abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research were searched from 1996 - 2001 inclusive. Also an expert informant's search in the Japanese language was made by Prof. Y. Ogawa in 1996. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which doxapram was used for the treatment of apnea in preterm infants were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each author evaluated the papers for quality and inclusion criteria. Independent data extraction was carried out. MAIN
resultsOnly one trial, which randomized 11 infants to intravenous doxapram and 10 infants to placebo, was found. There were fewer treatment failures after 48 hours in the group of preterm infants treated with doxapram (4/11) compared with the group treated with placebo (8/10). The wide confidence intervals made this result non-significant [RR 0.45 (0.20, 1.05)]. Only one infant, who was from the placebo group, was given IPPV. Of the seven responders by 48 hours in the group of 11 who received doxapram, five failed to respond between 48 hours and seven days after commencement of therapy. This gives a late failure rate of 9/11, similar to the short term failure rate in the placebo group of 8/10. It is not possible to evaluate the late responses of all those in the placebo group since they crossed over to a treatment arm. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsAlthough intravenous doxapram might reduce apnea within the first 48 hours of treatment, there are insufficient data to evaluate the precision of this result or to assess potential adverse effects. No longterm outcomes have been measured. Further studies are needed to determine the role of this treatment in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11687067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.